Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for March 20th, 2006

A Living Elder?

I received a call from my good friend, Kyle Gardner, on Saturday. We’d lost touch of one another for a couple of years (I think prior even to Sofie’s birth in August 2003), but over the last few months, I’ve tried a couple of different ways to contact him a handful of times. All my address, phone and email information was out of date and useless. But a couple of weeks ago, I did an internet address and phone search and discovered an address and a phone number for a Kyle Gardner who lived very close to the last address I had. So, on a chance, I called the number. The answering machine picked up but I instantly recognized the voice. It was, indeed, Kyle. I left a message, and it was that message Kyle was responding to when he called this weekend.

I cannot tell you how encouraging, and timely, that phone call was. What follows is an explanation why–that is to say an encomium on Kyle’s life. (Kyle, you have a link to my blog now, so if you are fearful of preserving your humility and are reading this, you may feel free to skip the rest.)

I took the class Old Testament poetry from Kyle (a two-semester course, if I recall correctly, with Psalms in semester one, Job and Proverbs through Song of Songs in semester two). But I had met Kyle before through an informal gathering of several friends that met every Thursday night over the course of a couple of years to study, talk about and live what truths we found in art, philosophy and literature. One should note that this was at a conservative Bible college where intellectualism was not shunned, but certain bodies of “secular” knowledge were suspect. Ours was a sort of quiet rebellion, but not intended as such. We just wanted to know God everywhere he manifested himself. In our group was a poet (now a journalist out in the Pacific Northwest), a philosopher (now teaching at Rochester College in Virginia), a painter and sculptor (now teaching art in the public schools), a budding film maker (who, regrettably, did not pursue his interest), myself and a handful of others that came and went. We watched Franky Schaeffer’s film series, based on his dad’s book, “How Should We Then Live?,” read T. S. Eliot and Hans Rookmacher, watched Bergman’s “The Seventh Seal” and wrote some of our own works that we shared with one another. It was an amazing, and, for me, a life-altering time. I can quite confidently say I would not be what I am today were it not for that study group. We always called it simply, “Kyle’s Study Group,” as he led us through various ideas and discussions.

While at Bible college, I had the benefit of a handful of godly mentors: Mark Scott (New Testament and preaching), J K Jones (ministry and spiritual disciplines), and Kenny Boles (Greek and NT exegesis). And I wanted at various times to emulate one or another of these men. Probably in my final two years of school I felt closest to J K and Kyle. But as the years have passed and time has weeded through these relationships, it is only the relationship with Kyle that God has seen fit to sustain. As each year goes by, it is clearer to me why that has been the case.

I do not wish to slight any of my former mentors. They do all remain godly examples of faith and learning. All of them have marked my life, and I owe all of them–and our Lord–a great debt of gratitude.

But in God’s gracious and generous providence, my relationship with Kyle and his influence in my life has been lasting. There are many reasons why, but it seems to me at this point in my life they can be summed up in a single thought: Kyle knows what it is to suffer in Christ.

Kyle has endured the afflictions of multiple sclerosis for many many years now. It led several years ago to his ouster from a church he had served for several years, as they sought a minister who could do more, physically, than Kyle was able to do. I’m sure they had what they felt to be good reasons for their decision. But in my subjective inclination to take up Kyle’s side, I felt it to be an injustice. Over the next few years, Kyle suffered, it seems to me, a similar sort of injustice as he relocated to Michigan to serve a ministry from which he was subsequently relieved again. But in God’s gracious care, Kyle has always served God’s people as a minister, and his wife has always been able to find work to also meet their needs. In fact, ironically, Kyle has served as something of a semi-permanent “interim” minister for a couple of United Churches of Christ congregations in central Michigan. And God has blessed his ministry.

Kyle has taken a lot of letters and phone calls from me when I’ve been at my lowest (though not only on those occasions), and he has always been able to draw from his own reservoir of prayerful experience to point me to the one thing that matters: Christ and his Kingdom–assuring me that “all these things” will be added as well. Through Kyle I am continually pointed toward, reminded of and reassured by God’s providential love and care. God is seldom early, Kyle will express to me, but never late.

On the phone with Kyle Saturday I felt a measurable and noticeable level of peace that I have not experienced in some weeks. We talked about many things, and did not spend a lot of time dwelling on specifically spiritual matters. And yet, the entire conversation was suffused with faith and grace and mercy. I came away from that half-hour on the phone stronger in my faith and more peaceful.

Kyle would not claim for himself the title of “elder,” or “spiritual father.” And I do not equate him with the Orthodox elders in the faith, or mean to claim for him such a title. But it is a title that might fit, if it fits Christians like Kyle. All I know is that my experience with Kyle seems similar, at least on the surface, to those who describe their times with Blessed Hieromonk Seraphim or St. John of San Francisco. Whatever it is, it is. I simply rejoice in God’s goodness to me, and in the faith and encouragement my friend Kyle brings.

May the Lord grant him many years!

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

From Dr. John Romanides’ Original Sin According to St. Paul:

Resurrection1255x337.jpgSt. Paul does not say anywhere that the whole human race has been accounted guilty of the sin of Adam and is therefore punished by God with death. Death is an evil force which made its way into the world through sin, lodged itself in the world, and, in the person of Satan, is reigning both in man and creation. For this reason, although man can know the good through the law written in his heart and may wish to do what is good, he cannot because of the sin which is dwelling in his flesh. Therefore, it is not he who does the evil, but sin that dwelleth in him. Because of this sin, he cannot find the means to do good. He must be saved from “the body of this death.”[ 210 ] Only then can he do good. What can Paul mean by such statements? A proper answer is to be found only when St. Paul’s doctrine of human destiny is taken into account.

If man was created for a life of complete selfless love, whereby his actions would always be directed outward, toward God and neighbor, and never toward himself–whereby he would be the perfect image and likeness of God–then it is obvious that the power of death and corruption has now made it impossible to live such a life of perfection. The power of death in the universe has brought with it the will for self-preservation, fear, and anxiety,[ 211 ] which in turn are the root causes of self-assertion, egoism, hatred, envy and the like. Because man is afraid of becoming meaningless, he is constantly endeavoring to prove, to himself and others, that he is worth something. He thirsts after compliments and is afraid of insults. He seeks his own and is jealous of the successes of others. He likes those who like him, and hates those who hate him. He either seeks security and happiness in wealth, glory and bodily pleasures, or imagines that this destiny is to be happy in the possession of the presence of God by an introverted and individualistic and inclined to mistake his desires for self-satisfaction and happiness for his normal destiny. On the other hand, he can become zealous over vague ideological principles of love for humanity and yet hate his closest neighbors. These are the works of the flesh of which St. Paul speaks.[ 212 ] Underlying every movement of what the world has come to regard as normal man, is the quest for security and happiness. But such desires are not normal. They are the consequences of perversion by death and corruption, though which the devil pervades all of creation, dividing and destroying. This power is so great that even if man wishes to live according to his original destiny it is impossible because of the sin which is dwelling in the flesh [ 213 ]–“Who will deliver me from the body of this death?”[ 214 ]

To share in the love of God, without any concern for one’s self, is also to share in the life and truth of God. Love, life and truth in God are one and can be found only in God. The turning away of love from God and neighbor toward the self is breaking of communion with the life and truth of God, which cannot be separated from His love. The breaking of this communion with God can be consummated only in death, because nothing created can continue indefinitely to exist of itself.[ 215 ] Thus, by the transgression of the first man, the principle of “sin (the devil) entered into the world and through sin death, and so death passed upon all men…”[ 216 ] Not only humanity, but all of creation has become subjected to death and corruption by the devil.[ 217 ] Because man is inseparably a part of, and in constant communion with, creation and is linked through procreation to the whole historical process of humanity, the fall of creation through on man automatically involves the fall and corruption of all men. It is through death and corruption that all of humanity and creation is held captive to the devil and involved in sin, because it is by death that man falls short of his original destiny, which was to love God and neighbor without concern for the self. Man does not die because he is guilty for the sin of Adam.[ 218 ] He becomes a sinner because he is yoked to the power of the devil through death and its consequences.[ 219 ]

St. Paul clearly says that “the sting of death is sin,”[ 220 ] that “sin reigned in death,”[ 221 ] and that death is “the last enemy that shall be destroyed.”[ 222 ] In his epistles, he is especially inspired when he is speaking about the victory of Christ over death and corruption. It would be highly illogical to try to interpret Pauline thought with the presuppositions (1) that death is normal or (2) that at most, it is the outcome of a juridical decision of God to punish the whole human race for one sin, (3) that happiness is the ultimate destiny of man, and (4) that the soul is immaterial, naturally immortal and directly created by God at conception and is therefore normal and pure of defects (Roman scholasticism). The Pauline doctrine of man’s inability to do the good which he is capable of acknowledging according to the “inner man” can be understood only if one takes seriously the power of death and corruption in the flesh, which makes it impossible for man to live according to his original destiny.

The moralistic problem raised by St. Augustine concerning the transmission of death to the descendants of Adam as punishment for the one original transgression is foreign to Paul’s thoughts. The death of each man cannot be considered the outcome of personal guilt. St. Paul is not thinking as a philosophical moralist looking for the cause of the fall of humanity and creation in the breaking of objective rules of good behavior, which demands punishment from a God whose justice is in the image of the justice of this world. Paul is clearly thinking of the fall in terms of a personalistic warfare between God and Satan, in which Satan is not obliged to follow any sort of moral rules if he can help it. It is for this reason that St. Paul can say that the serpent “deceived Eve”[ 223 ] and that “Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.”[ 224 ] Man was not punished by God, but taken captive by the devil.

This interpretation is further made clear by the fact that Paul is insisting that “until the law sin was int he world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless, death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression.”[ 225 ] It is clear that Paul here is denying anything like a general personal guilt for the sin of Adam. Sin was, however, in the world, since death reigned even over them who had not sinned as Adam sinned. Sin here is obviously the person of Satan, who ruled the world through death even before the coming of the law. This is the only possible interpretation of this statement, because it is clearly supported elsewhere by Paul’s teachings concerning the extraordinary powers of the devil, especially in Romans 8:19-21. St. Paul’s statements should be taken very literally when he says that the last enemy to be destroyed is death [ 226 ] and that “the sting of death is sin.”[ 227 ]

From what has been observed, the famous expression, eph’ho pantes hemarton,[ 228 ] can be safely interpreted as modifying the word, thanatos, which preceeds it, and which grammatically is the only word which fits the context. Eph’ho as a reference to Adam is both grammatically and exegetically impossible. Such an interpretation was first introduced by Origen, who obviously used it with a purpose in mind, because he believed in the pre-existence of all souls whereby he could easily say that all sinned in Adam. The interpretation of eph’ho as “because” was first introduced into the East by Photius,[ 229 ] who claims that there are two interpretations prevalent–Adam and thanatos–but he would interpret it dioti (because). He bases his argument on a false interpretation of II Corinthians 5:4 by interpreting eph’ho, here again, as dioti. But here it is quite clear that eph’ho refers to skensi (eph’ho skenei ou thelomen ekdysasthai). Photius is interpreting Paul within the framework of natural moral law and is seeking to justify the death of all men by personal guilt. He claims that all men die because they sin by following in the footsteps of Adam.[ 230 ] However, neither he nor any of the Eastern Fathers accepts the teaching that all men are made guilty for the sin of Adam.

From purely grammatical considerations it is impossible to interpret eph’ho as a reference to any word other than thanatos. Each time the grammatical construction of the preposition epi with the dative is used by Paul, it is always used as a relative pronoun which modifies a preceding noun [ 231 ] or phrase.[ 232 ] To make an exception in Romans 5:12 by making St. Paul use the wrong Greek expression to express the idea, “because,” is to beg the issue. The correct interpretation of this passage, both grammatically and exegetically, can be supplied only when eph’ho is understood to modify thanatos–kai houtos eis pantas anthropous ho thanatos dielthen eph’ho (thanato) pantes hemarton–“because of which” (death), or “on the basis of which” (death), or “for which (death) all have sinned.” Satan, being himself the principle of sin, through death and corruption involves all of humanity and creation in sin and death. Thus, to be under the power of death according to Paul is to be a slave to the devil and a sinner, because of the inability of the flesh to live according to the law of God, which is selfless love.

The theory of the transmission of original sin and guilt is certainly not found in St. Paul, who can be interpreted neither in terms of juridicism nor in terms of any dualism which distinguishes between the material and the allegedly pure, spiritual, and intellectual parts of man. It is no wonder that some Biblical scholars are at a loss when they cannot find in the Old testament any clear-cut support for what they take to be the Pauline doctrine of original sin in terms of moral guilt and punishment.[ 233 ] The same perplexity is met by many moralistic Western scholars when they study the Eastern Fathers.[ 234 ] Consequently, St. Augustine is popularly supposed to be the first and only of the early Fathers who understood the theology of St. Paul. This is clearly a myth, from which both Protestants and Romans need liberation.

It is only when one understands the meaning of death and its consequences that one can understand the life of the ancient Church, and especially its attitude toward martyrdom. Being already dead to the world in baptism, and having their life hidden with Christ in God,[ 235 ] Christians could not falter in the face of death. They were already dead, and yet living in Christ. To be afraid of death was to be still under the power of the devil–II Timothy 1:7: “For God hath not given us the spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of sound mind.” In trying to convince the Roman Christians not to hinder his martyrdom, St. Ignatius wrote: “The prince of this world would fain carry me away, and corrupt my disposition toward God. Let none of you therefore, who are in Rome, help him.”[ 236 ] The Cyprianic controversy over the fallen during times of persecution was violent, because the Church understood that it was a contradiction to die in baptism and then to deny Christ for fear of death and torture. The canons of the Church, although today generally ignored as an aid to understanding the inner faith of the ancient Church, still remain very severe for those who would reject their faith for fear of death.[ 237 ] Such an attitude towards death is not the product of eschatological frenzy and enthusiasm, but rather of a clear recognition of who the devil is, what his thoughts are,[ 238 ] what his powers over humanity and creation are, how he is destroyed through baptism and the mystagogical life within the body of Christ, which is the Church. Oscar Cullman is seriously mistaken in trying to make the New Testament writers say that Satan and the evil demons have been deprived of their power, and that now leur puissance n’est qu’apparente.[ 239 ] The greatest power of the devil is death, which is destroyed only within the body of Christ, where the faithful are continuously engaged in the struggle against Satan by striving for selfless love. This combat against the devil and striving for selfless love is centered in the corporate Eucharistic life of the local community–“For when you assemble frequently epi to auto (in the same place) the powers of Satan are destroyed and the destruction at which he aims is prevented by the unity of your faith.”[ 240 ] Anyone, therefore, who does not hear the Spirit within him calling him tothe Eucharistic assembly for the corporate life of selfless love is obviously under the sway of the devil. “He, therefore, who does not assemble with the Church, has even by this manifested his pride and condemned himself…”[ 241 ] The world outside of the corporate life of love, in the sacraments, is still under the power of the consequences of death and therefore a slave to the devil. The devil is already defeated only because his power has been destroyed by the birth, life, death and resurrection of Christ; and this defeat is perpetuated only in the remnant of those saved before Christ and after Christ. Both those saved before Christ and after Him are saved by His death and resurrection, and make up the New Jerusalem. Against this Church the devil cannot prevail, and by this fact he is already defeated. But his power outside of those who are saved remains the same.[ 242 ] Satan is still “the god of this world,”[ 243 ] and it is for this reason that Christians must live as if not living in this world.[ 244 ] . . .

Resurrection2258x332.jpgIt is clear that for St. Paul the bodily resurrection of Christ is the destruction of the devil, death, and corruption. Christ is the first fruits from the dead.[ 245 ] If there is no resurrection there can be no salvation.[ 246 ] Since death is a consequence of the discontinuation of communion with the life and love of God, and thereby a captivity of man and creation by the devil, then only a real resurrection can destroy the power of the devil. It is inaccurate and shallow thinking to try to pass off as Biblical the idea that the question of a real bodily resurrection is of secondary importance. At the center of Biblical and patristic thought there is clearly a Christology of real union, which is conditioned by the Biblical doctrine of Satan, death and corruption, and human destiny. Satan is governing through death, materially and physically. His defeat must be also material and physical. Restoration of communion must be not only in the realm of mental attitude, but, more important, through creation, of which man is an inseparable part. Without a clear understanding of the Biblical doctrine of Satan and his power, it is impossible to understand the sacramental life of the body of Christ, and, by consequence, the doctrine of the Fathers concerning Christology and Trinity becomes a meaningless diversion of scholastic specialists. Both Roman scholastics and Protestants are undeniably heretical in their doctrines of grace and ecclesiology simply because they do not see any longer that salvation is only the union of man with the life of God in the body of Christ, where the devil is being ontologically and really destroyed in the life of love. Outside of the life of unity with each other and Christ in the sacramental life of corporate love there is no salvation, because the devil is still ruling the world through the consequences of death and corruption. Extra-sacramental organizations, such as the papacy, cannot be fostered off as the essence of Christianity because they are clearly under the influence of worldly considerations and do not have as their sole aim the life of selfless love. In Western Christianity, the dogmas of the Church have become the object of logical gymnastics in the classrooms of philosophy. What is usually taken as natural human reason is set up as the exponent of revealed theology. The teachings of the Church concerning the Holy Trinity, Christology, and Grace, are no longer the accepted expressions of the continuous and existential experience of the body of Christ, living within the very life of the Holy Trinity through the human nature of Christ, in whose flesh the devil has been destroyed and against whose body (the Church) the gates of death (hades) cannot prevail.

FOOTNOTES

[ 210 ] Rom. 7:13-25

[ 211 ] Heb. 2:14-15

[ 212 ] Gal. 5:19-21

[ 213 ] Rom. 7

[ 214 ] Rom. 7:24

[ 215 ] Athanasius, op. cit, 4-5

[ 216 ] Rom. 5:12

[ 217 ] Rom. 8:20-22

[ 218 ] St. John Chrysostom, Migne, P.G.t. 60, col. 391-692; Theophylactos, Migne, P.G.t. 124, c. 404-405

[ 219 ] St. Cyrill of Alexandria, Migne, P.G.t. 74, c. 781-785, and especially c. 788-789; Theodoretos of Cyrus, Migne, P.G.t. 66, c. 800

[ 220 ] I Cor. 15:56

[ 221 ] Rom. 5:21

[ 222 ] I Cor. 15:26

[ 223 ] II Cor. 11:3

[ 224 ] I Tim. 2:14

[ 225 ] Rom. 5:13-14

[ 226 ] I Cor. 15:26

[ 227 ] I Cor. 15:56

[ 228 ] Rom. 5:12

[ 229 ] Amphilochia, heroteseis, 84, Migne, P.G.t. 101, c. 553-556

[ 230 ] Ecumenius, extracts from Photius, Migne, P.G.t. 118, c. 418

[ 231 ] Rom. 9:33; 10:19; 15:12; II Cor. 5:4; Rom. 6;21

[ 232 ] Phil. 4:10

[ 233 ] e.g., Lagrange, Epitre aux Romains, p. 117-118; Sanday and Headlam, Romans, p. 136-137

[ 234 ] A Gaudel, Peche Originel, Dictionaire de Theologie Catholique, t.xii, premiere partie

[ 235 ] Col. 3:3

[ 236 ] Rom. 7

[ 237 ] Canon 10, First Ecum. Council; Apostolic Canon 62; Canon 1, Council of Angyra, 313-314; Canon 1, Peter of Alexandria

[ 238 ] II Cor. 2:11

[ 239 ] Christ et le temps, p. 142

[ 240 ] St. Ignatius, Epistle to the Ephesians, ch. 13

[ 241 ] Ibid., ch. 5

[ 242 ] Eph. 2:12; 6:11-12; II Thes. 2:8-12

[ 243 ] II Cor. 4:4

[ 244 ] Col. 2:20-23

[ 245 ] I Cor. 15:23

[ 246 ] I Cor. 15:12-19

Read Full Post »